# $PEBBLES Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-13 20:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $PEBBLES  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-13 20:30 UTC (2026-07-13T20:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-13-20-30/crypto/PEBBLES  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-13-20-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 284
- **Likes:** 19
- **Retweets:** 10
- **Comments:** 4

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 4, Retweets: 10, Likes: 19, Impressions: 284


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @reddit
> **Author:** [@reddit](https://x.com/reddit)  
> **Metrics:** 11 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 1.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/reddit/status/c8e77aedbc3ab7fb0f88c6c9df836aa112900a38b96512c2594d1502d03d45fe](https://x.com/reddit/status/c8e77aedbc3ab7fb0f88c6c9df836aa112900a38b96512c2594d1502d03d45fe)  


> 
> "55% miner activation is not too low for BIP-110. We don't even need 55% to activate it. 55% is only needed to activate it early as a MASF. Even with 0%, it would still be activated as a UASF. 0% of the network opposes it, it's a very minor change, it's not contentious and it's a temporary soft fork.

Suggested"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Casa_NUA` (https://x.com/Casa_NUA)