# $QUIP Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-13 18:20 UTC

> **Asset:** $QUIP  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-13 18:20 UTC (2026-07-13T18:20:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-13-18-20/crypto/QUIP  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-13-18-20/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 243
- **Likes:** 43
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 40

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 40, Retweets: 0, Likes: 43, Impressions: 243


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @GabbyArtboy
> **Author:** [@GabbyArtboy](https://x.com/GabbyArtboy)  
> **Metrics:** 25 likes · 0 retweets · 17 comments · 331 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/GabbyArtboy/status/2076716456889537019](https://x.com/GabbyArtboy/status/2076716456889537019)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a NFT collection page for "Project R3D" on Ethereum, with a floor price of 0.0005 ETH, a 1D floor drop of -24.1%, top offer of 0.0004 WETH, 24H volume of 0.04 ETH, total volume of 80.57 ETH, and 2,300 unique owners (23%). The caption relates to the post's criticism of the Project R3D founder's lack of engagement, as the stats reveal a declining floor price (-24.1% in 24 hours) and very low trading volume (only 0.04 ETH in 24 hours), suggesting weak market interest compared to the more active Racerz NFT.  

> 
> "Art is so so good

But seems founder and team aren’t so eager to make a move.

I remember when Racerz was at $6, Mich started pushing things, 
• Swept a lot
• opened dc for holders and did raffles
• automatic WL for some nft for holding Racerz
• kept the marketing motion even"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@sajib1006` (https://x.com/sajib1006)