# $SOLKOBA Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-13 03:30 UTC

> **Asset:** $SOLKOBA  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-13 03:30 UTC (2026-07-13T03:30:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-13-03-30/crypto/SOLKOBA  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-13-03-30/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 217
- **Likes:** 4
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 4, Impressions: 217


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @asanoha_gold
> **Author:** [@asanoha_gold](https://x.com/asanoha_gold)  
> **Metrics:** 10 likes · 7 retweets · 13 comments · 1.5K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/asanoha_gold/status/2076485796111208545](https://x.com/asanoha_gold/status/2076485796111208545)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of a Twitter post by @crypt1le announcing that BIP-110 has reached its activation threshold at Block 963,648, with a quote-tweet referencing it, followed by a comment from @BranBTC suggesting that 0.1 BTC in transaction fees across 10 blocks could be used to kill the noncompliant transactions, contextualizing the discussion around Bitcoin protocol upgrades and controversial content inscriptions.  

> 
> "Why is 
@BranBTC
 the CEO of 
@_btcinc
 @BitcoinMagazine
 @TheBitcoinConf
 on Twitter commenting in support of anon posts talking about inscribing so many dick picks that Bitcoin should be renamed Block of Dicks?

Hey 
@DavidFBailey
 @_rileyio
 do you guys also support renaming Bitcoin to"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@sol_koba` (https://x.com/sol_koba)