# $MAGA Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-12 17:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $MAGA  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-12 17:40 UTC (2026-07-12T17:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-12-17-40/crypto/MAGA  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-12-17-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 512
- **Likes:** 59
- **Retweets:** 16
- **Comments:** 9

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 9, Retweets: 16, Likes: 59, Impressions: 512


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @haydenzadams
> **Author:** [@haydenzadams](https://x.com/haydenzadams)  
> **Metrics:** 33 likes · 5 retweets · 13 comments · 2.6K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2076360965268852794](https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2076360965268852794)  


> **Visual Context:** A screenshot of a tweet from Shual (@0xShual) questioning why people would care about Uniswap developments if they don't benefit UNI holders. The tweet shows 1 reply, 1 like, and 110 views, which relates to the broader discussion about Uniswap's protocol fees being active and the ongoing governance proposals regarding fee distribution across various chains.  

> 
> "Wild so many people didn't get the memo: uniswap protocol fees are on + burn UNI 

Get constant replies from ppl thinking they're off 

Btw 3 gov proposals being voted on now:
1) robinhood chain fees (v2/v3)
2) v4 fees 
3) bridge cleanup for fees on xlayer, ava, megaeth, sonium"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Motiondyor` (https://x.com/Motiondyor)