# $MSTR Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-12 00:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $MSTR  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-12 00:40 UTC (2026-07-12T00:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-12-00-40/crypto/MSTR  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-12-00-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 4.1K
- **Likes:** 51
- **Retweets:** 9
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 9, Likes: 51, Impressions: 4131


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @_J64_
> **Author:** [@_J64_](https://x.com/_J64_)  
> **Metrics:** 51 likes · 9 retweets · 0 comments · 4.1K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/_J64_/status/2076007922274873416](https://x.com/_J64_/status/2076007922274873416)  


> 
> "“The man owns an enormous amount of the supply of an asset that I believe the world is going to acknowledge is a real asset for collateral.” - 
@jvisserlabs
Very few see the opportunity that sits in front of MSTR when BTC is an integral part of the value chain of society. When

[Spoken audio]: The first Bitcoin sale was like a dip in the dip your toe in the water. The second one was like a cannonball in the deep end. The first time it sold off the second time is sold off a little bit, but it almost seemed like the market was like whatever and they really didn't care. So maybe he should get some kudos for the way that he did this and its minimal impact on the market with the big sale. But do you take or read into that sale or the response from the market? A year from now, this stuff is going to be noise. I'm actually a little embarrassed to be associated with something where we have to even talk about this ridiculous thing. The Michael Saylor thing to me, he's even become like people are blaming him for why Bitcoin's not going higher. Bitcoin as we talked about, in every asset you have corrections. I don't get into for your cycles, I don't get into any of this stuff. But the reality is what he has done and what he has been able to do, I'm more focused on the quantum side of crypto and the solutions that are coming out and some of the themes about should we just basically deal with these tokens that are dormant and should we, the mana owns an enormous amount of supply of an asset that I believe the world is going to acknowledge is a real asset for collateral and as we get into tokenization and we start getting into the dormant asset side, I think people will start to understand the value of collateral again like they'll start to understand what he has always talked about. So I never bought into this thing. I do agree that the most important thing is that it's actually higher than when he made his biggest sale. That would be a sign that if you would have said to people, hey, what would happen if a week after he makes his biggest sale, the unthinkable that he said he would never do publicly? And even though this is for different reasons, so it doesn't count, but he did do it, what would happen? Everyone would have said the thing would be down big. So the fact that it's higher I think is a Apple type news item where it happened and once you don't sell off after something like that, it actually is more of a positive than a negative. So I don't think this will ever be talked about again in a big way."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@_J64_` (https://x.com/_J64_)