# $SHIB Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-11 20:50 UTC

> **Asset:** $SHIB  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-11 20:50 UTC (2026-07-11T20:50:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-11-20-50/crypto/SHIB  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-11-20-50/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 2
- **Total Impressions:** 1.1K
- **Likes:** 18
- **Retweets:** 6
- **Comments:** 6

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 6, Retweets: 6, Likes: 18, Impressions: 1076


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @ProfesorTurkmen
> **Author:** [@ProfesorTurkmen](https://x.com/ProfesorTurkmen)  
> **Metrics:** 24 likes · 3 retweets · 6 comments · 5.2K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/ProfesorTurkmen/status/2076046980841693379](https://x.com/ProfesorTurkmen/status/2076046980841693379)  


> 
> "Kripto boğası yavaştan geliyor ama bazı coinlere, piyasa büyük depresyonlardan sonra nihayet artık düzelme rampasına girecek. Tamamına yakını bizde var..."


### Post #2 by @Cryptolution
> **Author:** [@Cryptolution](https://x.com/Cryptolution)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 174 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Cryptolution/status/2076046842069180898](https://x.com/Cryptolution/status/2076046842069180898)  


> 
> "JUST IN: 
@marshallmixing
 and 
@katemparkman
 discuss why the BIP110 filtering proposals targeting #Ordinals will not pass based on the current state of Bitcoin consensus.

Full Video: 
youtu.be/dfywHWkBcow?si
…

[Spoken audio]: These filters just don't work because there's always ways to bypass them. Bitcoin ordinals, you know, came about, but you could still prune them from your nodes, right? A lot of people figured that out pretty quickly. And then Bitcoin stamps were created as a way of storing arbitrary data on chain by splitting them up into multiple pieces on multiple UTXOs and making them unprunable. So there's always just like these ways around, you know, having this arbitrary data on chain. But to their credit, they actually discussed this directly in the bit And they say there's this quote that says, requiring users to divide their files into chunks of at most 256 bytes, raising the costs both in fees and an effort sends a clear message that data storage abuses in general are unwelcome rather than sanctioned or supported. So they are basically acknowledging like, Hey, yeah, this isn't going to be like 100% successful. Yeah, and you know removing data from you know from the blockchain, but it's maybe you know Just gonna maybe lessen it a little bit I guess and and at least send a message that we don't want this type of stuff on on Bitcoin But I don't know it's not terribly hard to create like a Bitcoin stamp compared to like creating an ordinal I just I feel like it's just it's just not gonna work and it seems like it's pretty wide consensus at this point that yeah This bit is is not gonna go through Yeah, it's gonna fail and is gonna result in a fork just like Bitcoin cash or BSV So that's that's my thoughts on that, but I'm curious curious what you think about it Yeah, I'm pretty with you on that. I think like to sum it up I just I feel like the whole value of Bitcoin is that nobody gets to decide which transactions are deemed acceptable or legitimate And I again, I understand where it comes from, but I just yeah, I don't know it's censorship-resistant money And I just don't think that that's for a small group to decide what that means."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Mazrael_shib` (https://x.com/Mazrael_shib)

- `@YBCRYP` (https://x.com/YBCRYP)