# $NEAR Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-11 15:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $NEAR  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-11 15:40 UTC (2026-07-11T15:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-11-15-40/crypto/NEAR  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-11-15-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 24.9K
- **Likes:** 41
- **Retweets:** 4
- **Comments:** 3

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 3, Retweets: 4, Likes: 41, Impressions: 24892


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @adam3us
> **Author:** [@adam3us](https://x.com/adam3us)  
> **Metrics:** 0 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 73 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/adam3us/status/2075969939815485720](https://x.com/adam3us/status/2075969939815485720)  


> 
> "Agreed but note 110 is a hazard for Bitcoin, so is being rejected to protect massively defended key properties reasons. You are not going to be able to make key property eroding changes. Except in an Idiocracy outcome where users get too uninformed to maintain, so destroy Bitcoin"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@NEARProtocol` (https://x.com/NEARProtocol)