# $HOODRAT Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-10 12:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $HOODRAT  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-10 12:10 UTC (2026-07-10T12:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-10-12-10/crypto/HOODRAT  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-10-12-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 8.3K
- **Likes:** 94
- **Retweets:** 12
- **Comments:** 81

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 81, Retweets: 12, Likes: 94, Impressions: 8310


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @Ethprofit
> **Author:** [@Ethprofit](https://x.com/Ethprofit)  
> **Metrics:** 11 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 1.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/Ethprofit/status/2075205394197106992](https://x.com/Ethprofit/status/2075205394197106992)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows blockchain transaction records with transaction hashes (25489463, 25489460), involving addresses such as 0x8c949361... and 0xc50e8a5c0..., with transactions highlighted in a red box showing large transfers of 639,999.4995132, 159,999.8738783, and 200,000 OUT from what appears to be a "Multicall" function. The post highlights how a massive amount was sent to the wrong address (likely a scammer or wrong recipient) instead of the intended one, emphasizing the need for double-checking transaction details before sending large sums.  

> 
> "Thats like going to a bank to depositing $1M and then a homeless deshelved guy walks in and you hand him the money instead of the teller.

All they had to do was DOUBLE CHECK."




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Jeremybtc` (https://x.com/Jeremybtc)