# $WURK Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-08 01:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $WURK  
> **Momentum Status:** Cooling Down  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-08 01:40 UTC (2026-07-08T01:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-08-01-40/crypto/WURK  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-08-01-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 15
- **Likes:** 2
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 2, Impressions: 15


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @CryptoSociety42
> **Author:** [@CryptoSociety42](https://x.com/CryptoSociety42)  
> **Metrics:** 22 likes · 0 retweets · 14 comments · 6.4K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/CryptoSociety42/status/2074474399525437751](https://x.com/CryptoSociety42/status/2074474399525437751)  


> **Visual Context:** A Weibo post by user "李博杰" (Li Bojie) titled "吐槽下DeepSeek的面试流程" (Complaining about DeepSeek's interview process) describes his negative experience with DeepSeek's interview, claiming he was made to wait over half a month for an arrangement, was asked to write code on a second-round interview, and was ultimately not selected after being questioned about a problem he was researching. The post, which has 612 likes and 43 comments, sparked controversy involving accusations from user Du Jun about Li Bojie's integrity, as referenced in the accompanying commentary.  

> 
> "Li Bojie accused DeepSeek of having issues, saying he was offended and asking everyone to help expose it.  
Du Jun stepped forward again to accuse Li Bojie of lacking integrity, saying he took the money and ran off.  
Everyone knows Du Jun all too well—his reputation isn't great,"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@saha876249` (https://x.com/saha876249)