# $DOG Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-07 18:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $DOG  
> **Momentum Status:** Trending Up  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-07 18:00 UTC (2026-07-07T18:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-07-18-00/crypto/DOG  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-07-18-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 126
- **Likes:** 5
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 5, Impressions: 126


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @reddit
> **Author:** [@reddit](https://x.com/reddit)  
> **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 4 comments · 200 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/reddit/status/63393dc300ab3e95dad0933a78bb53d32159950395aefe36536f7dd4097b63ab](https://x.com/reddit/status/63393dc300ab3e95dad0933a78bb53d32159950395aefe36536f7dd4097b63ab)  


> 
> "Are the authors of “hijacking Bitcoin” Roger ver and Steve Patterson still proponents of bch?

I watched a fairly recent discussion where I could have sworn Steve Patterson said he doesn’t believe in bch anymore (and I think he was implying that the bch dev team is vulnerable to Corruption in much the same way btc’s is. . Then Roger ver kinda been silent? Maybe part of the agreement with his tax case? . Can anyone enlighten me ? Am I wrong here? . Thanks"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Cryptolution` (https://x.com/Cryptolution)