# $NANSEN Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-07 10:10 UTC

> **Asset:** $NANSEN  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-07 10:10 UTC (2026-07-07T10:10:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-07-10-10/crypto/NANSEN  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-07-10-10/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 344
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 344


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @MaxiCalls
> **Author:** [@MaxiCalls](https://x.com/MaxiCalls)  
> **Metrics:** 6 likes · 0 retweets · 5 comments · 329 views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/MaxiCalls/status/2074437033842352419](https://x.com/MaxiCalls/status/2074437033842352419)  


> 
> "BONK DAO just showed one of the ugliest sides of token-based governance.

An attacker reportedly spent around $4.4M buying enough BONK to pass a proposal, then used that voting power to move roughly $20M from the DAO treasury into a wallet they controlled.

The uncomfortable part"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@blckchaindaily` (https://x.com/blckchaindaily)