# $BASE Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-06 18:40 UTC

> **Asset:** $BASE  
> **Momentum Status:** Stable  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-06 18:40 UTC (2026-07-06T18:40:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-06-18-40/crypto/BASE  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-06-18-40/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 301
- **Likes:** 26
- **Retweets:** 5
- **Comments:** 23

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 23, Retweets: 5, Likes: 26, Impressions: 301


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @definalist
> **Author:** [@definalist](https://x.com/definalist)  
> **Metrics:** 15 likes · 5 retweets · 2 comments · 3.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/definalist/status/2074196462003736670](https://x.com/definalist/status/2074196462003736670)  


> **Visual Context:** Arkham Intelligence blockchain forensics interface showing a USD > $1 transfer history between Binance Hot Wallet (Stfzk), Binance Deposit addresses, and an entity labeled "crypto_notte (NRYz)" with various transaction amounts ranging from $10 to $83.39K, highlighting potential connections related to a governance attack involving ~$3M in YES votes and shared Binance deposit addresses.  

> 
> "It does look like a governance attack, and the ~$3M worth of YES votes were cast by “CyEE..typQ"wallet, and there was mutual interation with crypto_notte's binance deposit address
@crypto_notte
 ??
app.realms.today/dao/84pGFuy1Y2
…"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@Natalia77351991` (https://x.com/Natalia77351991)