# $EDBALLOON Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-06 15:30 UTC > **Asset:** $EDBALLOON > **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly > **Timestamp:** 2026-07-06 15:30 UTC (2026-07-06T15:30:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-06-15-30/crypto/EDBALLOON > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-06-15-30/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 1 - **Total Impressions:** 925 - **Likes:** 17 - **Retweets:** 1 - **Comments:** 2 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 2, Retweets: 1, Likes: 17, Impressions: 925 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @RahamanYusuff > **Author:** [@RahamanYusuff](https://x.com/RahamanYusuff) > **Metrics:** 7 likes · 2 retweets · 9 comments · 126 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/RahamanYusuff/status/2074094413467259284](https://x.com/RahamanYusuff/status/2074094413467259284) > **Visual Context:** The image is a diagram titled "Quantum Computing Vulnerability in Public Key Encryption" that compares how RSA (using two large primes A and B to create a product N as the public key) and ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography, using an elliptic curve E and point P for scalar multiplication to produce public key Q) are both broken by Shor's Algorithm on quantum computers—factoring N and solving the discrete logarithm problem respectively—with a note that current quantum requires millions of qubits to execute these attacks. This visually supports the post's warning that cryptocurrency wallets, signatures, and keys were built on classical cryptographic assumptions (RSA/ECC) that quantum computing threatens to break. > > "Quantum computing has moved from sci-fi to an engineering and timeline problem for cryptography and most cryptocurrency infrastructure wallets, signatures, keys was built on classical assumptions that didn't fully bake in this future. . @quipnetwork quantum computing isn't going" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@Ed_Balloon` (https://x.com/Ed_Balloon)