# $ELSA_ETH Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-05 19:00 UTC

> **Asset:** $ELSA_ETH  
> **Momentum Status:** Fading Quickly  
> **Timestamp:** 2026-07-05 19:00 UTC (2026-07-05T19:00:00Z)  
> **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-05-19-00/crypto/ELSA_ETH  
> **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-05-19-00/crypto.md  

---

## 10-Minute Social Metrics
- **Posts Analyzed:** 1
- **Total Impressions:** 21
- **Likes:** 0
- **Retweets:** 0
- **Comments:** 0

---


## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis
Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 21


---

## Cited Community Posts & Evidence


### Post #1 by @koolkrypto223
> **Author:** [@koolkrypto223](https://x.com/koolkrypto223)  
> **Metrics:** 82 likes · 7 retweets · 13 comments · 12.3K views  


> **Source Link:** [https://x.com/koolkrypto223/status/2073797487262155105](https://x.com/koolkrypto223/status/2073797487262155105)  


> **Visual Context:** The image shows a Perpetual DEX List comparison table for executing $1M and $1 billion BTC trades, highlighting Lighter's significantly lower execution costs ($3.40 and $71.0) compared to Hyperliquid's ($45.8 and $466.0) at 4.5 bps. The post argues this comparison is "cherry picked" because it ignores Hyperliquid's staking tier discounts, maker rebates, and volume-based fee reductions that users can access.  

> 
> "I'm very long 
$LIT
 and all, but these comparisons against 
@HyperliquidX
 fees are always very cherry picked imo

They're completely ignoring staking tier discounts, maker discounts, volume discounts. Even just 100-1000 staked 
$HYPE
, >$10m monthly volume, and executing ~50/50"




---


## Contributing Accounts

- `@elsa_eth` (https://x.com/elsa_eth)