# $STETH Social Sentiment & Intelligence — 2026-07-05 13:30 UTC > **Asset:** $STETH > **Momentum Status:** Heating Up > **Timestamp:** 2026-07-05 13:30 UTC (2026-07-05T13:30:00Z) > **Canonical URL:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-05-13-30/crypto/STETH > **Overview Brief:** https://cryptitalk.com/2026-07-05-13-30/crypto.md --- ## 10-Minute Social Metrics - **Posts Analyzed:** 1 - **Total Impressions:** 317 - **Likes:** 0 - **Retweets:** 0 - **Comments:** 0 --- ## Momentum & Sentiment Analysis Total Engagement - Comments: 0, Retweets: 0, Likes: 0, Impressions: 317 --- ## Cited Community Posts & Evidence ### Post #1 by @frugalbc > **Author:** [@frugalbc](https://x.com/frugalbc) > **Metrics:** 2 likes · 0 retweets · 0 comments · 113 views > **Source Link:** [https://x.com/frugalbc/status/2073747472174772678](https://x.com/frugalbc/status/2073747472174772678) > > "Crypto investors love developer count. But Hyperliquid $HYPE is a reminder that revenue may matter more. A tiny team generating serious revenue tells me more about product-market fit than a big developer chart. Developers can be incentivized. Revenue is harder to [Spoken audio]: liquid is bringing in crazy revenue. I think personally, revenue is far more important of a metric when evaluating a cryptocurrency than developer account, because you can have a bunch of developers being incentivized by its foundation. And that doesn't mean they're building anything useful that people are actually using. When you look at hyper liquid has 11 people working at it, and they're making millions and millions per year. That to me is a bigger signal of product market fit than developer count, which like I said, it's kind of a a meaningless metric. So while I think we there may be disagreement about which metric is correct and how the methodology what I'm telling you is I don't think it actually matters. I like to see revenue because to me revenue singles product market fit" --- ## Contributing Accounts - `@blckchaindaily` (https://x.com/blckchaindaily)